Redefining Family Dynamics: From Patriarchal Norms to Egalitarian Bonds

Redefining Family Dynamics: From Patriarchal Norms to Egalitarian Bonds


In the ever-evolving tapestry of human relationships, the dynamics of family structures and interpersonal connections have witnessed profound shifts. Rooted in centuries-old traditions and influenced by societal norms, these dynamics have, for the longest time, been tethered to patriarchal beliefs and rigid gender roles. However, as the winds of change sweep across contemporary society, there’s an urgent call to reevaluate, reimagine, and reconstruct our understanding of family and power. The following exploration delves into the historical framework, the challenges posed by traditional therapy, and the transformative potential of a modern approach, aiming to shed light on the path towards more balanced, equitable, and fulfilling relationships in today’s world.

The Historical Framework: Traditional Gender Roles in Heterosexual Relationships

Historically, family structures have been deeply influenced by patriarchal norms. Men were often pigeonholed as the primary breadwinners, while women’s roles were confined to caregiving and homemaking (Olson et al., 2022). In the heart of the post-World War II era, the American collective painted a picturesque vision of family life: Rows of suburban houses with white picket fences encapsulating a dream many aspired to fulfill. Central to this image was the father, donning his suit and tie, heading out to a stable job, ensuring financial security for his family. Back at home, the mother, the household anchor, lovingly attended to the children and managed the daily affairs of the house. This was not just a fleeting trend but an era that many fondly remember as a golden age (particularly of Capitalism), where the role of men as the primary breadwinners was not just expected but celebrated.

The emerging “social media” of the time was the television, and glowing blue screens across the nation broadcasted shows like “Leave It to Beaver” and “Father Knows Best.” These programs, while entertaining, drove home the message of what an “ideal” American family should look like. Women who dared to step outside this mold, seeking employment or chasing the dream of higher education, often found themselves at odds with societal expectations. They were the outliers, the rebels, sometimes admired but more often met with raised eyebrows and whispered judgments.

However, this was not just a cultural phenomenon. The roots of these gender roles ran deep, anchored in centuries of legal and societal constraints that predominantly favored men. In vast swathes of the world, from the shores of the U.S. to the heartlands of the UK, the law itself was a silent enforcer of these norms. Women, for the longest time, were denied the fundamental right to own property or even sign contracts unless they had a male figure—be it a husband or father—co-signing alongside them. Such laws did not just underline men’s dominance in the family structure; they enshrined it.

As decades passed, the doors of universities and professional institutions echoed the footsteps of a majority male populace. In the 1950s, women comprised only about one-third of the total college student body in the U.S. By the late 1960s, the number had grown, but women still constituted less than 40% of all college students (National Center for Education Statistics, 2019). Women’s participation in graduate programs was even more limited. In the early 1960s, women earned just 22% of master’s degrees and a mere 10% of doctoral degrees awarded in the U.S. (National Center for Education Statistics, 2019). When it came to professional fields like medicine, law, and engineering, the gender disparity was even starker. For instance, in 1960, only 5.5% of medical school graduates in the U.S. were women (Association of American Medical Colleges, 1960). Similarly, in law, women made up less than 4% of first-year students in American Bar Association-approved law schools in 1960 (American Bar Association, 1961).

These statistics demonstrate that during the “golden age”, higher education and professional institutions were predominantly male domains. Women faced numerous societal, cultural, and institutional barriers that limited their access to and progress within these areas and in turn, their ability to actualize their potential, let alone experience equitable relationships. Despite their aspirations and capabilities, women needed more opportunities in higher education and professional sectors. These constraints were more than just barriers; they were a clear message, compelling women to remain tethered to roles of dependency and domesticity.

These examples highlight the societal norms of the time and underscore the systemic barriers women faced, perpetuating power imbalances within family structures.

However, while the patriarchal system often privileged men in terms of power and control, it simultaneously imposed a heavy burden of expectations on them. Men were (and often still are) socially conditioned to be the primary breadwinners, to suppress emotions, and display traits typically associated with “masculinity,” such as strength, stoicism, and dominance. The pressure to conform to these expectations could lead to emotional repression, mental health challenges, and limited opportunities for genuine interpersonal connections. For instance, the stereotype that “real men don’t cry” potentially deprived men of the therapeutic release of emotional expression (Brannon, 1976). Additionally, the pressure to be the sole financial provider placed significant stress on many men, making them vulnerable to anxiety, depression, and other health issues (Pleck, 1981). In essence, the rigid gender roles of the patriarchal system didn’t just confine women; they also entrapped men, limiting their emotional freedom and holistic well-being These rigid roles not only created a foundation for power imbalances and, in many cases, perpetuated them, it also undermined the well-being of all involved.

Traditional Therapy Can Inadvertently Reinforcement of Patriarchy

While therapy has long been a refuge for many seeking understanding and change, traditional models have sometimes missed the mark. Knudson-Martin (2013) argues that conventional therapeutic interventions can inadvertently sustain patriarchal norms, mainly when focusing on individual pathology or mutual contributions to problems without considering systemic power imbalances.

Many prevalent approaches to couples therapy focus on improving partner communication (Dattilio, 2010; Gottman et al., 1999; Guerney, 1977; Johnson, 2004; Markman et al., 2010; Wile, 1981). On the surface, this seems logical and even beneficial. However, when applied without a critical understanding of gender dynamics, it can fall short. For instance, if a wife feels unheard or marginalized in decision-making processes, the therapy might focus on her need to “communicate more effectively” or “assert herself more.” This perspective inadvertently places the onus on the individual (in this case, the wife) to adjust without addressing the more significant patriarchal norms that might make her husband dismiss or overshadow her input (Alipour, 2020; Mensah, 2022). Therapy can inadvertently reinforce patriarchal norms by emphasizing individual communication skills without addressing systemic power dynamics (Knudson-Martin, 2013).

Even in physical health and relationships, gender dynamics play a pivotal role. A study conducted in South Africa highlighted the influence of hegemonic masculine norms (HMN) in promoting sexual risk-taking and the subordination of women, especially in the context of HIV prevention. The research emphasized the significance of sexual communication self-efficacy as a potential leverage point for enhancing HIV prevention behaviors among heterosexual couples (Leddy et al., 2016). Similarly, a study from Mwanza, Tanzania, delved into family planning decisions and perceptions, revealing women’s challenges in a male-dominated culture. This study underscored the low contraceptive use in developing countries, primarily influenced by patriarchal values (Mosha et al., 2013). But the Westernized world isn’t a “developing” world, right? We in the U.S. have the ability to talk about these things and resolve such conflicts, right?

As it turns out, another common practice in talk therapy is to teach couples conflict resolution skills (Askari et al., 2013; Christensen et al., 2000; Greenberg, et al., 2008; Schwartz, 1995). While resolving conflicts is undoubtedly crucial, problems arise when therapists fail to recognize underlying power imbalances. If a husband, conditioned by patriarchal norms, tends to dominate decisions and dismisses his wife’s concerns, a conflict resolution approach might aim to find a “middle ground.” However, given the power differential, this middle ground might still favor the husband’s perspective. The wife might compromise more often, leading to a facade of resolution while the patriarchal status quo remains unchallenged (Knudson-Martin, 2013).

Reflecting on these examples, it becomes evident that even well-intentioned therapeutic interventions can fall into the trap of subtly upholding patriarchal norms. By emphasizing individual adjustments and overlooking systemic power dynamics, traditional therapy models risk perpetuating gender imbalances rather than addressing them. As therapy evolves, practitioners must integrate a critical understanding of these dynamics, ensuring that interventions promote equality, mutual respect, and genuine connection between partners. Overlooking these dynamics can hinder intimacy and connection by perpetuating male privilege and unequal dynamics.

The Contemporary Era: A Paradigm Shift and a New Perspective on Power

Today, with changing societal norms and a growing emphasis on gender equality, there is a pressing need to re-examine and evolve our understanding of power and family dynamics.

Traditionally, power has been equated with domination and control. However, a closer look reveals that true power is not about exerting dominance over others but about self-mastery and influencing through authenticity (Backman et al, 2007; Bateson, 1972; Madenes, 1981). This perspective challenges our conventional understanding and underscores the importance of redefining power in relationships and society. Historically, the perception of men as the ‘dominant’ force and women as ‘submissive’ or ‘nurturing’ can be linked to our culture’s skewed understanding of power. The illusion of power through control has perpetuated patriarchal norms, leading to rigid gender roles and imbalances in family dynamics. Nelson Mandela, former President of South Africa and anti-apartheid revolutionary, is a prime example of redefining power through self-mastery rather than domination. Despite being imprisoned for 27 years, Mandela emerged with a vision of peace and reconciliation, choosing not to pursue revenge against those who had oppressed him. Instead, he championed a united South Africa, leading through authenticity, humility, and inclusivity. Rather than using his position to exert dominance or control, Mandela demonstrated that true power lies in the ability to unite, inspire, and lead by example.

Another example is Mother Teresa. Known for her charitable work and selfless dedication to the poor, she showcased power through authenticity and compassion. Rather than wielding power “traditionally”, she influenced millions worldwide through her genuine acts of kindness and commitment to service. Her influence was not derived from a position of authority or control but from her authentic dedication to helping those in need. Her life’s work challenged the conventional understanding of power, emphasizing love, service, and humility as the true markers of influence.

Chasing the illusion of power through control not only leads to imbalances in relationships but also broader societal issues. From environmental degradation to systemic inequalities, Westernized obsession with control has had far-reaching consequences.  A clear manifestation of the Westernized obsession with control can be seen in the relationship between humans and the environment. The Industrial Revolution marked a pivotal point where technological advancements enabled mass production and economic growth. However, this progress came at a cost. The illusion of having control over nature led to the over-exploitation of natural resources. Forests were cleared at unprecedented rates, non-renewable resources were extracted without foresight, and rivers and air were polluted with industrial waste. The belief that humans could dominate and control nature without consequence resulted in environmental degradation (Mann, 2011). Today, we face the repercussions of this mindset with challenges like climate change, biodiversity loss, and a global ecological crisis. The short-sighted pursuit of power and control over the environment without understanding the interconnectedness of ecosystems has led to long-term societal challenges that we grapple with today.

As we work towards redefining gender roles and fostering more balanced family dynamics, we must embrace a more genuine understanding of power—one rooted in vulnerability, connection, and mutual respect. Virginia Satir, a prominent figure in the field of family therapy, emphasized the importance of authentic communication and the transformative potential of human connection in her work (Satir, 1972). Building on this foundation, Dr. Brené Brown, a research professor at the University of Houston, has delved deeper into the nuances of vulnerability, courage, shame, and empathy. In her work, Brown (2012) consistently emphasizes the strength and authenticity of embracing vulnerability. Rather than perceiving it as a weakness, vulnerability emerges as a cornerstone of genuine leadership and connection. Brown elucidates that vulnerability is not about winning or losing; it’s about the courage to be present and authentic, even in the face of uncertainty. Especially in relationships, vulnerability can pave the way for profound connections and mutual understanding. By allowing ourselves to be genuinely seen—warts and all—we set the stage for more authentic, equitable relationships, challenging the traditional power dynamics rooted in dominance and control.”

Reflecting on these historical imbalances, the deep-seated notions of power, and the transformative potential of vulnerability and mutual respect, we come to an undeniable realization. The very fabric of family dynamics is undergoing a profound shift. Moving away from archaic notions of dominance and predefined roles, we are stepping into an era where adaptability, understanding, and shared responsibilities are at the forefront. This sets the stage for a new definition of family: Rigid roles do not define an egalitarian family structure but are fluid and adaptable—financial, caregiving, or emotional responsibilities are shared. Decision-making is collaborative, ensuring mutual respect for individual aspirations and boundaries.

The Role of Therapy in Paving the Way Forward in the Modern Era

Knudson-Martin (2013) emphasizes that therapists have an ethical responsibility to recognize and challenge inherent biases, leading to more egalitarian relationship dynamics. Therapists are uniquely positioned to facilitate this transformation as they can guide families toward healthier dynamics by actively challenging patriarchal norms, promoting open communication, and fostering understanding. As Olson et al. (2022) highlight, with the evolution of families, the expectations and roles within them also transform.

One way such evolution is occurring is in the contemporary era, dual-income households. These have become the norm rather than the exception in many parts of the world. According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2020), 63% of families with children have both parents employed. This shift highlights the evolving dynamics where both partners contribute to the family’s financial well-being. The traditional notion of the male as the primary breadwinner has been challenged, leading to more shared responsibilities in earning and caregiving. Television shows like “Modern Family” and “The Office” reflect these changing dynamics, portraying characters who navigate the complexities of balancing work and family life in an egalitarian framework. Such shifts in media representation, mirroring real-world changes, underscore the importance of adaptability and shared responsibilities in contemporary families.

Another testament to the evolving family dynamics in the modern era is the introduction and acceptance of shared parental leave policies in numerous countries. For instance, Sweden introduced a parental leave policy in the 1970s that allowed fathers to take as much time off as mothers, aiming to promote gender equality (Duvander & Johansson, 2019). This policy not only challenged traditional gender roles but also paved the way for fathers to be more involved in child-rearing from the early stages. Such policies underscore the importance of shared responsibilities and challenge the entrenched belief that caregiving is primarily a woman’s domain. By promoting equal participation from both parents, these policies foster an environment where decision-making and responsibilities are genuinely collaborative. By integrating these insights, therapists can help families navigate this change, promoting balance and harmony.

In the intimate confines of the therapy room, professionals have a unique vantage point to witness and reshape the narratives that families and couples bring with them. This privileged position grants therapists an opportunity, and indeed a responsibility, to facilitate a transformative journey towards more egalitarian relationships.

One of the foundational steps toward equity and inclusion in the therapy journey is for therapists to deconstruct gendered assumptions that often subtly infiltrate our stories actively. For instance, when discussions around finances surface, it’s not uncommon for age-old scripts about men as primary earners to emerge. Therapists can introduce couples to contemporary narratives that celebrate the benefits and dynamics of dual-income households. Such conversations not only offer alternative perspectives but also plant the seeds for couples and families to evaluate and rewrite their ingrained beliefs critically.

However, challenging these deep-seated narratives is just the beginning. A pivotal aspect of this transformation lies in the equitable division of responsibilities within the household. It’s not enough to merely discuss equality and equity; it must be visualized and practiced. Therapists can employ various tools, from mapping exercises that outline household duties to discussions around shared childcare responsibilities. By spotlighting policies like Sweden’s progressive parental leave (Duvander & Johansson, 2019), therapists can underscore the tangible benefits of shared roles. This hands-on approach ensures that both partners not only understand but also feel the intrinsic value of their contributions, fostering a genuine sense of partnership.

Lastly, the heart of this transformation rests in embracing a new understanding of power—one rooted in vulnerability, connection, and mutual respect. The therapy room becomes a sanctuary where partners can authentically express their aspirations, fears, and boundaries. By weaving in contemporary family portrayals from shows like “Modern Family” or “The Office,” therapists provide relatable touchpoints for families to explore and redefine their dynamics. These discussions, anchored in genuine understanding and exploration, empower families to actively design their own blueprint, one that moves beyond the illusion of control and dominance, forging a path towards a more fluid, egalitarian structure. With these strategies, therapists are not just passive (or even active) listeners but rather agents of change (Minuchin, 1974), guiding families toward a future that champions equality, mutual respect, and shared responsibility.

In Conclusion

The tapestry of family dynamics is intricate, interwoven with threads of cultural norms, societal expectations, and personal beliefs. As the landscape of society continues to evolve, so too must our understanding of relationships, roles, and power. The challenges posed by patriarchal norms and outdated gender roles are significant, but they also offer an opportunity—a chance to redefine, reimagine, and rebuild. Therapists stand at the crossroads of this transformation, armed with the tools, insights, and empathy to guide families and couples towards more egalitarian, balanced, and fulfilling relationships. By actively challenging and reshaping traditional narratives, promoting genuine communication, and championing shared responsibilities, therapists play a pivotal role in shaping a brighter, more inclusive future. As we journey forward, the vision is clear: a world where relationships are defined not by rigid roles but by mutual respect, understanding, and love. In this world, power is not about dominance but about collaboration, connection, and shared growth. It’s a vision worth striving for, and together, we can make it a reality.



Askari, M., Noah, S. M., Hassan, S., & Baba, M. (2013). Comparison of the effects of communication and conflict resolution skills training on mental health. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 5(1), 91-100.

Backman, S., & Nevis, S. M. (2007). The Myth of Power. Gestalt Review, 11(1), 74-89.

Bateson, G. (1972), Steps to an Ecology of the Mind. New York: Ballantine Books.

Brannon, R. (1976). The male sex role: Our culture’s blueprint of manhood, and what it’s done for us lately. In D. David & R. Brannon (Eds.), The forty-nine percent majority: The male sex role (pp. 1-45). Random House

Brown, B. (2012). Daring Greatly: How the Courage to Be Vulnerable Transforms the Way We Live, Love, Parent, and Lead. Gotham Books.

Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2020). Employment characteristics of families summary. U.S. Department of Labor.

Christensen, A., & Jacobson, N. S. (2000). Reconcilable differences. Guilford Press.

Dattilio, F. M. (2010). Cognitive-behavioral therapy with couples and families: A comprehensive guide for clinicians. Guilford Press.

Duvander, A. Z., & Johansson, M. (2019). Parental leave and the glass ceiling in Sweden. In: Nieuwenhuis, R., & Maldonado, L. C. (Eds.). The triple bind of single-parent families: Resources, employment, and policies to improve well-being. Policy Press.

Gottman, J. M., & Silver, N. (1999). The seven principles for making marriage work. Crown Publishers.

Greenberg, L. R., & Goldman, R. N. (2008). Emotion-focused couples therapy: The dynamics of emotion, love, and power. American Psychological Association.

Guerney, B. G. (1977). Relationship enhancement: Skill-training programs for therapy, problem prevention, and enrichment. Jossey-Bass.

Johnson, S. M. (2004). The practice of emotionally focused couple therapy: Creating connection (2nd ed.). Brunner-Routledge.

Knudson-Martin, C. (2013). Why power matters: Creating a foundation of mutual support in couple relationships. Family Process, 52(1), 5-18.

Leddy, A., Chakravarty, D., Dladla, S., de Bruyn, G., & Darbes, L. (2016). Sexual communication self-efficacy, hegemonic masculine norms and condom use among heterosexual couples in South Africa. AIDS Care, 28(2), 228-233.

Madanes, C. (1981). Strategic Family Therapy. Jossey-Bass.

Mann, C. C. (2011). 1493: Uncovering the New World Columbus Created. Vintage.

Markman, H. J., Stanley, S. M., & Blumberg, S. L. (2010). Fighting for your marriage: A deluxe revised edition of the classic best-seller for enhancing marriage and preventing divorce. Jossey-Bass.

Mensah, E. O. (2022). Husband is a priority: Gender roles, patriarchy and the naming of female children in Nigeria. Journal of African Cultural Studies.

Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and Family Therapy. Harvard University Press.

Mosha, I., Ruben, R., & Kakoko, D. (2013). Family planning decisions, perceptions and gender dynamics among couples in Mwanza, Tanzania: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health, 13(1), 523.

Olson, D., DeFrain, J., & Skogrand, L. (2022). Marriages and families: Intimacy, diversity, and strength (10th ed.). McGraw Hill.

Pleck, J. H. (1981). The myth of masculinity. MIT Press

Satir, V. (1972). Peoplemaking. Science and Behavior Books.

Schwartz, R. C. (1995). Internal family systems therapy. Guilford Press.

Wile, D. B. (1981). Couples therapy: A nontraditional approach. Wiley-Interscience.

Leave a reply:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked*